Home› Groups› Good Grant Practice Community› GFGP› systems used for grants finance and procurement

systems used for grants finance and procurement

Started by Akanyang Thando Jun 19, 2025 3 replies 👁 4 views
Akanyang Thando Member Newcomer (0+ points) Newcomer
Jun 19, 2025 at 7:16 am

Good day,

 

I want to ask. the grants/ finance systems that other institutions are using for their grants management processes

Animut Tadele (PhD) Member Newcomer (0+ points) Newcomer
1 year ago

In the university Finance and administration Office, there are Finance and procurement offices. So, grants finance and procurement are carried out through these offices based on the procurement and finance guidelines of the nation.

Solomon Member Newcomer (0+ points) Newcomer
12 months ago

In my organization, we use QuickBooks for financial management and a custom procurement tracking system for all purchases related to grants. These systems allow us to maintain transparent financial records, ensure compliance with donor regulations, and generate accurate reports for internal and external audits. Using these systems also helps us align with GFGP principles by enforcing approval workflows, managing budgets efficiently, and tracking expenditures against grant objectives. We are continuously working to enhance integration between procurement and finance to further improve accountability.

Charles Member Expert (800+ points) Expert
2 months ago

Solomon, this is a helpful breakdown, particularly the point about
integrating procurement and finance rather than running them as separate
tracking exercises, that integration gap is exactly where many smaller
organizations lose audit trail clarity.

At Purpose Rwanda, we're at an earlier stage of this journey than what
you've described. Following our recent governance overhaul under Rwanda's
revised NGO law, we formalized a dedicated Audit Organ, but our underlying
financial systems are still maturing toward the level of integration you're
describing. Currently, our approach centers on:


Segregated approval workflows, no single individual can
both initiate and approve an expenditure, a basic but non-negotiable control
given our team's size.


Grant-specific expenditure tracking, we tag every
transaction to a specific funder and project code, even when using relatively
simple tools, so reporting to each donor stays clean and auditable.


External audit as a forcing function, our KPMG-recommended
policies (approved December 2025–February 2026) have pushed us to formalize
practices earlier than we might have organically.

I'd be genuinely interested to know: at what point did your organization
decide QuickBooks plus a custom procurement tracker was necessary, versus
simpler tools? For smaller organizations like ours still scaling, understanding
that threshold, and where the return on system investment actually shows up,
would be very useful.