Based on my work with youth, women, mining communities, and funding in Kenya/Africa, here are the *3 real-world problems where agent-based modelling (ABM) would give you the most leverage*:*Top candidate: \"How funding delays + trust breakdowns cause youth mining cooperatives…

Sentez-vous salué cher Joseph, Profitez-en et revenez si vous avez des questions ou des suggestions de theme pour discussion.

Bienvenue @rokhaya diop, Nous sommes ravis de vous compter parmi nos participants. Profitez bien des cours et des discussions autour de des enjeux liés à la gestion des subventions. 

Bonjour, je suis Rokhaya Diop, ingénieure statisticienne de formation avec 5 ans d\'expérience en santé publique. Ravie d\'être là parmi vous.

Am Muganda Joel A Community Engagement officer and facilitator.Engaged with the youth for over 4 years on empowerment, Skilling.Sustainability and Resources Mobilization,Reporting, Communicating Impact, Leadership and Talent Development.And Currently at student of MBA in year 2

My name is Mohamed Christian Ngaujah from Sierra Leone. A dedicated, enthusiastic and analytical thinking graduate with a wide knowledge in Data Collection, Data Entry, Data Analysis, Data Interpretation, Data Management/Tools Development (both Digitalized Data management and Traditional Tools), DataVisualization, Data…

Thanks @pamela for your response

What real-world problem in our work could benefit most from agent-based modelling, and what data, assumptions, and stakeholder inputs would we need to make such a model useful and credible?

What real-world problem in our work could benefit most from agent-based modelling, and what data, assumptions, and stakeholder inputs would we need to make such a model useful and credible?

Bonjour tout le monde. 

Peer review is a structured and objective evaluation of a proposal conducted by a multidisciplinary team. It provides an opportunity for independent reviewers to assess the proposal with a fresh perspective, helping to identify weaknesses, gaps, or misalignments that authors often deeply immersed in their work may overlook. Read more

Let\'s give a significant budget for follow up on GBV cases and to ensure they are followed until end to achieve best data and clear reports on the cases

Temesgen Yalew

Ilham wrote:How can mentorship and academic networks be leveraged to improve the quality of grant proposals?Mentorship and academic networks improve grant proposals by providing expert guidance, constructive feedback, and collaboration opportunities. Mentors help refine ideas and align them with funder…

How can mentorship and academic networks be leveraged to improve the quality of grant proposals?

How should researchers discuss potential risks in a grant proposal without undermining confidence in the project’s feasibility?<div>

This is one of the questions a researcher should not overlook risk potential in the grant proposal stage because you don’t avoid risk, it should be frame to a manageable and anticipated. The Reviewers are expecting risks on a strong proposal that is compelling. What they’re evaluating is whether you are a thoughtful, prepared researcher. The following keys should be considered in risks management, e.g.:

Ø By acknowledging Risks Briefly and Clearly understandable

Ø By pair Every Risk with a Mitigation Strategy

Ø By emphasizing Preparedness, Not Uncertainty

Ø By categorizing Risks (Optional but Powerful in term of Methodological risks (e.g., data quality issues), Operational risks (e.g., access to participants), Technical risks (e.g., platform failure for digital repositories), and Ethical risks (e.g., data privacy concerns)

Ø By showing Feasibility Through Track Record or Design

Ø Avoid Overloading with Too Many Risks

Ø Use a Risk Table

Ø End with a Confidence Statement

</div>

Hi, I’m Charles Anyama from Purpose Rwanda in Kigali.

In grant writing, risk refers to the potential challenges or uncertainties that could affect the success of a project. These risks don’t mean the project will fail; rather, they highlight areas where extra care and planning are needed. Common types of risks include:

<ul type=\"disc\">

By acknowledging these possibilities, an NGO/Institution demonstrates foresight and responsibility.

1. Shows Credibility and Transparency

Recognizing risks proves that an organization is grounded in reality. It signals to donors that the organization understands the complexities of working in communities where political, financial, cultural, or logistical challenges are part of everyday life.

2. Builds Donor Confidence

Donors want assurance that their investment is safe. When an organization identify risks and explain how it will manage them, it’s an indication of readiness and thoughtfulness to adoption obstacles may arise.

3. Highlights Organizational Maturity

Experienced organizations don’t just celebrate success—they anticipate setbacks. Including risks demonstrates that Purpose Rwanda is professional, seasoned, and prepared to navigate difficulties.

4. Encourages Realistic Planning

Risk analysis compels an NGO/Institution to move beyond ideal scenarios. It helps design programs that are resilient, flexible, and sustainable, even when circumstances shift unexpectedly.

5. Strengthens Sustainability

Planning for risks is also planning for longevity. Donors see that an organization is not simply chasing funding but building systems that can withstand challenges over time.

Taking it from practical perspectives of Purpose Rwanda, instead of avoiding risks, we acknowledge them with confidence:

We recognize that community participation may fluctuate due to economic pressures or cultural stigma around addiction. To mitigate this, we engage local leaders early, provide consistent follow-up, and adapt our outreach methods to ensure inclusivity.

This kind of response feels honest yet reassuring—it shows awareness of challenges while emphasizing readiness to overcome them.